On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 6:38 AM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > Of course, and that's why we have other rules which moderate the other > rules. And the BLP policy itself is a rule. However if a piece of > evidence is both verifiable, and widely reported and yet negative about > a person, and that person vociferously objects to it's inclusion... > than what? That is the problem here. We should not white-wash a piece > of negative, verifiable, widely reported bit simply because it might > affect a person, or even if they claim it does or has. We're not the > nicey-nice patrol and shouldn't be forced to become it. We're > encyclopediasts and sometimes you have to say that Hitler was bad.
Hitler's a BLP? Man, my education sucks. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
