Why might it not become as reliable as any other magazine discussing media? It depends on the quality of the editing.
David Goodman, Ph.D, M.L.S. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DGG On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Ken Arromdee<[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 [email protected] wrote: >> The reason for my objection, is that we, our project, should not put >> ourselves into a position where we are becoming the main source of financial >> support for some newly-created effective auxiliary. I hope we can all see, >> how >> some obscure online subscription mag like "Pokeman Today" would get a >> tremendous boost just by being sourced to one of our articles. > > It's pretty unlikely that anything like that would be considered a reliable > source. > > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
