I do not think hosting the license is *quite* necessary, and I could be persuaded, especially before their webmaster has a chance to digest lunch. I think a caption below the image, which links to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/user:WikiWitch would be an exemplary citation.
"geni" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > 2009/6/6 Angela <[email protected]>: >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 2:26 AM, Sam Korn<[email protected]> wrote: >>> (Photo: <a >>> href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Houses_of_Parliament.jpg";>Wikipedia</a>) >>> >>> I imagine that would satisfy *almost* everyone. >> >> Adding the license wouldn't be much harder: >> >> (Photo: <a >>> href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Houses_of_Parliament.jpg";>Wikipedia</a>, >>> >>> <a href="http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html";>GFDL</a>) >> >> Angela > > Not really. You are still entirely reliant on wikipedia servers > staying up and the image staying in that place which is why you should > host the credit and probably the GFDL locally. > > -- > geni > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
![http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Houses_of_Parliament.jpg"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Houses_of_Parliament.jpg"){kind=link}