On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Charles Matthews<[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/aug/12/wikipedia-deletionist-inclusionist > > Much familiar argument from threads here. Some of the usual suspects > commenting, and everyone putting in their two cents. Somewhere in the > middle is a debate struggling to get out: is the volume of reversions > indicative of good gatekeeping (poor edits to popular and well-developed > articles have little chance of sticking), or bad gatekeeping > (established editors assert ownership)? Stats from 2007 and 2009 show a > step-change of some sort, as we know, but don't really prove that there > is a current trend (we could be going sideways). > > Charles
Regarding the familiar arguments related to this... should the Signpost be a venue for discussing thing stuff? See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions#.22Wikipedia_enters_a_new_chapter.22 -Sage _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
