"stevertigo" <stv...@gmail.com> wrote in message news:7c402e010908022342o8e581f3o566c6b7c610ac...@mail.gmail.com... On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 8:01 PM, <wjhon...@aol.com> wrote: > > I believe that you are mistakenly supposing that the list would discuss > > *a > > particular* case. I believe that the original proposal was to create a > > list that would discuss the resolution process itself, not a particular > > case > > of it, but rather the entirety of the process.
> Correct. > In reality though its next to impossible to intelligently deal with > anything at a macroscopic level without getting somewhat into certain > specific examples. So certain cases will come up, though they won't be > officially handled on the list. > But likewise its impossible to deal well with particular cases without > getting a serious overview. The latter concept is I believe the status > quo, and thus is the main reason why I propose a dedicated list. So, like the question of warnings. If an administrator says they are not necessary, and there might be cases where they are not, then I think they should justify preventing an established user with no block history from defending themselves. _______ An Elephaant coud drive a cruise ship through holes in what I am reflecting at: http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/WP_CRYSTAL.HTM (With a quick howto on merjerz). Nothing sounds like BrewJay's Babble Bin. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
