[http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/The_Wrong_Version Inevitable Postulate of Version Control]
"WereSpielChequers" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Actually there are circumstances when admins can and should edit fully > protected articles per: > WP:FULL.<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FULL> > > > Does anyone really object to the idea of admins responding to a request > for > admin help by editing a fully protected page in accordance with talkpage > consensus? > > WereSpielChequers > > >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 05:47:18 -0400 >> From: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] How wikipedia could link into File Protection. >> To: [email protected] >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" >> >> >> When full protection is used, then it should stay until it is changed to >> semi-protection. >> We should not have a type of protection that allows admins to make >> *content* changes willy-nilly. >> When an article is in full protection, admins should not be making >> content >> changes, except perhaps to revert changes that were the problematic ones >> in >> the first place. >> >> >> >> <<Jay's original email refers to using this when there has been an edit >> war - in other words when full protection *is* used currently.>> > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
