2009/8/19 <[email protected]>: > Well get busy I still once-in-a-while encounter articles whose only > source is EB1911. I would submit that if you actually put these up for > AfD you'd get a lot of backflack for SNOW. Sure the articles could be > fixed, but the previous point was that a single tertiary source isn't > sufficient for an article and I think it probably is.. depending.
I remember copyediting one article on a now-obscure 18th century British parliamentarian. Basically I just rewrote for style. And, y'know, I'm pretty sure it'd be a reasonable start on the article, and certainly not a deletion candidate just for having 1911EB as its sole source. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
