Less messages? If someone is on moderation, their messages will pile up until they are moderated (also giving people the impression that someone is sending messages through all at once), so it is unfair to put that requirement on someone on moderation. If the messages are irrelevant, why are the moderators letting them through? Or are the moderators just there to stop spam? Also, some of those messages were a day old. Maybe the moderators of this list need to start a thread to discuss what the subscribers to the list want to see in terms of moderation, including how quickly messages to the list should be moderated (is a day's delay acceptable? A week's delay? What sort of things should be moderated?).
Carcharoth On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:31 AM, Steve Bennett<[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. Jay, the last time I went through the moderation queue, there > were 15 messages from you. Could you please send less messages, and > make them more relevant? > > Thanks, > Steve (mod) > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 2:40 AM, Thomas Dalton<[email protected]> wrote: >> If you have a point that is within the scope of this mailing list, >> then make it. Please stop sending emails like this. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
