2009/9/9 David Gerard <[email protected]>: >> BLP talks about removing unverifiable harmful information about living >> people, it doesn't say verifiable harmful information should be >> removed (unless it is given undue weight). > > > That's the point - it's entirely in order to be very conservative in > what's accepted as verification of such.
If you genuinely think the sources are unreliable, then fine, but I don't believe that is the case. You are wikilawyering, pure and simple. If you want to ignore the rules, that's fine, we explicitly allow that, but be honest about it. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
