Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, you see, with respect to news of the Taliban's doings, they > probably are much more reliable then other media.
I was about to say... you earlier commented about "Iranian" news source and its reliability. You framed it as a question, "is [source] reliable?" but gave the impression that it somehow wasn't. I'm glad you made the point above, and if anyone doesn't understand it, they can start to think about all of familiar sources, starting with conspiracy theory sources, gossip rags, and tabloids and the slowly work their way up to People magazine. At that point they would probably be tired and would get the point: Don't knock it just because its "Iranian." > Let's suppose you have in your possession exact detailed plans for a > small H-bomb. Would you think you could simply put it into Wikipedia? Only if we have reliable, well-researched, and peer-reviewed sources. -Stevertigo _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
