Steve Bennett wrote: > Ok, that post was totally off topic. You're on moderation now. >
That seems unduly harsh for one post which your personal opinion judges off-topic Ec > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 12:10 PM, Jay Litwyn > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> http://ecn.ab.ca/~brewhaha/Sound/MSixths.mp3 >> DATA 35,27,2,24,40,6,45,27,2,30,50,4 >> DATA 55,33,2,36,60,4,65,39,4,42,70,4,0,0,4 >> ' How is it that the above numbers, which approximate the western scale, >> ' in stereo, in parts a constant major sixth (5:3) apart... >> DATA 60,35,2,30,40,6,54,45,2,27,50,4 >> DATA 54,55,2,48,60,4,54,65,4,60,70,4,0,0,8 >> sound a lot like the above series? >> Hint: you need to multiply all of them by 66/35 to render them. >> Complete source (or the equivalent in a key for ladies) available upon >> request. >> I like the first series better, because both parts are more interesting than >> the scale, while in the second version, one part basically is Doh-Ray-Mee. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
