2009/9/21 Charles Matthews <[email protected]>: > But if the only substance to the controversy is rumour, and speculative > discussion of rumours, we don't need either BLP or NPOV to work to > exclude it or cut it back to a bare statement.
I disagree. The controversy is notable, so why not discuss it? Perhaps it should be split off into a different article with just a brief summary in the BLP, but I don't see why it should be ignored. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
