Andrew Gray wrote: > I think a good analogy here is explicit general history articles. We > view it as quite normal to go from > > [[History of something]] > > and then, when it gets too large, split it out into > > [[History of something]] > * [[History of something in the Bronze Age]] > I know this is mildly on a tangent, but I find it interesting nevertheless...
Wouldn't that most likely be: * [[Prehistory & history of something in the Bronze Age]] ? Or something like that... IOW, doesn't the Bronze age kind-of straddle the boundary between prehistory and history? > * [[History of something in the Middle Ages]] > * [[History of something in World War I]] > > etc. > > PS. Feel free to moderate me if this is found to be too far from being of the topic of this list ;-D Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
