Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/10/20 Ryan Delaney <[email protected]>: > >> I like this. Ideally IAR should never be "invoked", as its not a rule; IAR >> should be assumed. That said, I agree with the call and want to give props >> for the detailed explanation, which should help smooth things over. >> > > I disagree. Following rules should be the default. We should only > ignore them if we have a good reason to do so. Otherwise, there is no > point having rules at all. > I'm happy with that. As long as we agree that all rules should have a point, also. If a rule is arbitrary, it needs a specially good point (example, which side of the road to drive on).
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
