Thomas Dalton wrote: > 2009/10/22 Surreptitiousness: > >> stevertigo wrote: >> >>> So the question is, how do we aggregate and sort arguments such that >>> we can apply a meta process for quickly discerning good, valid, >>> arguments, from those that aren't? Other than "IAR" that is? >>> >> Didn't we used to reformat discussions? Maybe we need to re-integrate >> that into our tool-box. >> > You mean refactoring? Refactoring an ongoing discussion is usually > very controversial and not worth the drama. Refactoring a closed > discussion might make a more useful archive, particularly I'm not sure > archives get read enough to be worth the effort.
Ooops! You're right; it should have been "refactoring", and I should have responded accordingly. Ec _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
