On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Ian Woollard <ian.wooll...@gmail.com> wrote: > Schroedinger's cat very definitely is fictitious; it's not an > experiment you can actually do and get an alive/dead cat that you can > actually see, you would get either an alive cat, or a dead cat.
I agree with the statement that it should not be in that category. Essentially, because schrodinger's cat is not a cat. Felix the Cat is a fictional cat. Simba the lion is a fictional cat, in a broader sense. Schrodinger's cat is a concept in physics that has nothing to do with cats or fiction. There is no notable fiction in which Schrodinger's cat features heavily, for example. To the OP: Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. One bad category member does not justify nuking an entire family of categories. Steve _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l