On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:57 AM, George Herbert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:43 AM, Charles Matthews > <[email protected]> wrote: >> David Gerard wrote: >>> http://www.make-digital.com/make/vol20/?pg=16 >>> >> Argument intelligent enough, use of "notable" is off-base though since >> for us notability is an attribute of topics. > > He's describing WP for an external audience. Not his fault that we > have internal jargon which is not entirely aligned with outside > standard english.
Actually, Charles was probably referring to these sentences: "...the debate over which sources are notable..." "...since there's consensus that the [New York] Times is a notable source..." Doctorow (the author of the article) should have said *reliable* sources, not notable sources. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
