On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Charles Matthews <charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > Carcharoth wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Carcharoth <carcharot...@googlemail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/2009/11/wikipedia_on_the_wane.html >>> >> >> Some interesting comments have been posted to that blog. >> > And of course some off-topic ranting. The original WSJ article shows how > easy it is to put together a newspaper article of people's gripes. Which > is not that surprising after eight and a half years of Wikipedia. But no > way does it do a good job of identifying what is going on, in terms that > stand up to analysis. And I mean something intermediate between sweeping > generalisations and anecdotal evidence.
Oh, absolutely. > Anyone else feel that Mr. Murdoch's little list beginning "1. Trash > Google rather than actually noindex News Corp's pages" has Wikipedia as > alternate new source somewhere on it? That's a bit too cryptic for me. I know a little about Murdoch and his stable of media publications, but not sure what the tie-up is with Google and Wikipedia. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
