Steve Bennett wrote:
> Here's another: when someone searches for an article (let's say "norwegian
> antarctic expedition") that doesn't exist, let's encourage them to add it -
> we have successfully located someone interested in a topic that we don't
> have an article about. This is a good start.

However, there are a lot of "gotchas" to the process of observing 
what appears to be a missing article and proceeding to attempt to 
create it, and it takes a good deal of experience in Wikipedianism to 
successfully navigate them.

Even apart from all the political tripwires a newbie could stumble 
into when the topic concerns something controversial either in the 
"real world" or in the bizarre confines of Wikipolitics, there's the 
matter of there possibly being an article on a topic already, just 
under a slightly different spelling.  On Wikipedia, capitalization 
and punctuation matter, and newbies can't be expected to know all the 
nitpicky conventions used to decide what the "proper" title of an 
article is.  Maybe they'll end up creating an article under 
"Norwegian Antarctic Expedition" when the slightly differently 
capitalized "Norwegian antarctic expedition" already exists but they 
didn't manage to find it.  Or maybe the existing article is under 
"Antarctic expeditions of Norway" or "Antarctic expeditions 
(Norwegian)".  Sometimes there are redirects from other obvious 
titles, but not always.  Or the newbie might misspell "Norwegian".

It's happened to me a few times, that I've created a new article 
where I thought there was a gap, then later found there to be one 
already under a slightly different name.

-- 
== Dan ==
Dan's Mail Format Site: http://mailformat.dan.info/
Dan's Web Tips: http://webtips.dan.info/
Dan's Domain Site: http://domains.dan.info/



_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to