2009/12/21 Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <[email protected]>: > The article was likely overstated. However, the editor involved did > have a substantial history of using administrative tools with respect > to global warming and related articles, as well as extensive editing > in the area, taking a consistent position, supporting a consistent > point of view. I encountered this myself when I helped avoid the > deletion of an RfC that was written by Raul654, certified by WMC, > then it was noticed that Raul had not certified it. Then I read the > RfC and was horrified, and that was the beginning of my involvement > with WMC and others active with the global warming article.
This is the one you were taken to arbitration over, and was the source of your proposal that experts be banned from editing articles on their expertise. Global warming nutters are really special. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
