Carcharoth wrote: > On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 4:21 PM, Carcharoth <[email protected]> > wrote: > > <snip> > > >> I would say the MilHist B-class criteria would be a good minimum >> standard). >> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Military_history/Assessment/B-Class > > * B1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate > inline citations. > * B2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious > omissions or inaccuracies. > * B3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or > more sections of content. > * B4. It is free from major grammatical errors. > * B5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an > infobox, images, or diagrams. > > Should all BLPs meet that standard? > > Simpler: they should be good stubs, not bad stubs. B5 is out-of-focus, anyway. B2 is almost impossible to assess (a case of a BDP, but I actually created two articles about the same person once, who had been a professor on both sides of the Channel, as was pointed out by someone looking over my shoulder from frWP).
Charles _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
