On 13 April 2010 23:06, Gregory Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote: > But the opposite approach is as bad or worse: If every issue must be > argued anew when someone brings it up then the ultimate outcome is > that by sheer pigheaded persistence you will eventually get your way > once everyone saner has tired or repeating the same argument, — or > even ignoring a single persistence force — that we'll always > eventually conduct things according to the initial impressions of a > typical uninformed person (because, again, the informed people will > drop out).
What you have described is what many describe as the problem with editing Wikipedia. (It tends to correct itself after a few years, or two generations of users.) - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
