On 2 June 2010 15:27, Bod Notbod <bodnot...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:22 PM, David Gerard <dger...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The "best" articles are the creation of algorithmic and >> judgement-impaired FA/GA review processes. You get what you measure. >> How to measure good writing? > What do you mean by algorithmic? I think I mean more like "procedural". There's a list of criteria. These are what is measured so these are what are optimised for. > And what do you feel needs changing in the review processes? FAs are frequently all but unreadable to the casual reader. How feasible would it be to add "intro clear to casual reader"? I realise some topics are just never going to be that clear ... particularly with the tendency for FAs to be about specialised topics. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
