William Pietri wrote: > > Our current plan is to raise that limit gradually as the performance > implications become clear. If the community wants us to keep some hard > limit, that's also doable. >
With the utmost of respect, what you want to do here is to hew very close to the community agreed consensus, and only depart after a new consensus develops. Going purely on what the iron will stand in terms of load, is a surefire way to bring about much drama and wringing of hands, heads and what have you. Not a desirable thing at all. I think I can encapsulate my advice in one sentence. "Please don't plan controversial things." Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
