On 9 August 2010 21:29, Ryan Delaney <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think you have to have delusional ideas about article "perfection" > to understand that at as article quality increases, the chance that any > individual edit will improve it decreases.
Not at all. The leap from "is" to "ought", however, is fallacious and an important and damaging error. [1] It's the "something must be done, this is something, therefore this is a good idea" fallacy. - d. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Is%E2%80%93ought_problem _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
