Two advantages of our current system over juries are efficiency and speed. This is particularly useful re blocking of vandals and speedy deletion of attack pages - in both cases the first admin to pass by will do the appropriate block or deletion. If you want a slower less efficient system you don't just need to show that the much larger number of jury members would be available, you also need to identify a benefit for this proposal, and that benefit would need to be more than commensurate with the disbenefits that I've identified.
WereSpielChequers On 20 August 2010 18:13, Ian Woollard <[email protected]> wrote: > We don't absolutely need admins at all. > > If we used randomly chosen juries to make decisions then we could use > bureaucrats or even bots to actually apply any decisions made. > > That essentially avoids the 'who polices the police' issue. > > -- > -Ian Woollard > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
