On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 9:38 PM, stevertigo <[email protected]> wrote:
> WereSpielChequers <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm prett suspect that the vast majority of reverts on EN wiki are > > reversion of vandalism by hugglers and other patrollers at newpage > > patrol. I don't think it would be a good idea to discourage those who > > do that accurately. Giving feedback to those with an excessive error > > rate is useful - but not what you are proposing. > > The concept is that reverts by people who don't participate in > discussion are typically misinformed or adversarial at best. If you > don't participate in discussion, there's no need for your help on the > article. > > -SC > > > While I would tend to agree with that thought for most content issues I would say that requiring people to be active in a discussion on a page before then can revert vandalism/attacks etc would be detrimental to the page and the project. -- James Alexander [email protected] _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
