That looks like the paper I read a preview copy of a few months ago at a wiki-meetup! I remember thinking much the same thing as David (Gerard) at the time, along the lines of "this is great stuff!". :-)
Carcharoth On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Samuel Klein <[email protected]> wrote: > Forwarding from foundation-l. > > David - thanks for the heads-up; this essay is brilliant, and not just > about biology. > Here's a shorter link: http://j.mp/ten-wiki-rules > > Magnus - I see your hand in this :-) I'd love to see the edit > history... Have you or your co-authors also published this on one of > the major wikis? > > SJ > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: David Gerard <[email protected]> > Date: Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 4:43 PM > Subject: Re: [Foundation-l] Has Wikipedia changed since 2005? > To: Wikimedia Foundation Mailing List <[email protected]> > > > On 28 September 2010 12:38, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Why are there any experts on Wikipedia? > > I predict Wikipedia's biology articles will far outshine its > philosophy articles for the simple fact that the biologists bother: > > http://www.ploscompbiol.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pcbi.1000941 > > (That article is great, by the way. It gives strong reasons for > experts to put in the effort to bother.) > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
