On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 5:46 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: > On 29 November 2010 17:33, Charles Matthews > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Points arise from that, clearly. But I'm hearing quite a lot recently >> from the "glass half empty" people. You know, ten short stubs are >> created, and a year later five are still stubby, five are much improved. >> Are we glad to have five new substantial articles, or embarrassed to >> have persistent five stubs? So has this made things proportionately >> better or worse? Discuss. > > > Wikipedia is a work in progress, despite a certain proportion of > editors always having been uncomfortable with this being apparent, and > a stub is frequently more informative to the reader than nothing.
But some data, like Charles is asking for, is not an unreasonable request. Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
