Liquid threads is an interesting idea in principle, but the reality is at best unfortunate. I've pretty much stopped editing on the Strategy Wiki because of it - I have broadband and a reasonably fast machine but I don't have the patience to wait for Liquid threads to load even when it works.
It is also a pain that one can't just quickly alter one's talkpage comments even to strike out a resolved point. I've just gone back and logged in for the first time in weeks. I clicked on new messages and after a while lost the will to live..... When it eventually showed me my talkpage - (to be fair it did work this time) there were a fraction of the messages I get on EN wiki. I'd hate to think how slow things would be if it was implemented on EN wiki. WereSpielChequers On 22 December 2010 11:49, Carcharoth <[email protected]> wrote: > On jargon, I still think "Neutral point of view" was a terrible name > that confused neutrality with lack of bias. You cannot sum up a policy > like NPOV in a single phrase, so in that case, I think NPOV is better > than saying "neutral" something. Sometimes a Wikipedia "term of art" > can be misleading and the abbreviation is *less* misleading. > > On interfaces, I think the main improvements will probably be in the > realm of templates and how references are added. At least that is what > I am hoping for. Talking of other interface things, what do people > think of LiquidThreads, which looks like it is in use on some wikis > now, from what I can see. > > Carcharoth _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
