On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Charles Matthews
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On 06/02/2011 13:53, Samuel Klein wrote:
>> Tom - Great idea.
>>
>> I believe what we want to end up with  is OSQA, like what OSM has set
>> up, not a (proprietary) StackOverflow site.
>> OSQA is a great tool for collaborative knowledge-sharing.
>>
>> http://meta.osqa.net/questions/127/osqa-vs-stackoverflow-performance-and-features
> This has to be either-or?

It isn't either-or, and I started following the SO test-site.  In the
short-term, people have already started sharing questions there. In
the medium-term, I hope we end up pointing people to a free and open
Q&A site, if any.  Supporting the development of OSQA will benefit
knowledge-sharing in the world beyond this particular use of it.

SJ

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to