Just as we have no way of knowing which of our editors are AIs who have passed the Turing test, I doubt if they will be able to tell which of their editors are humans who can pass a reverse Turing test.
Incidentally one of my friends who is in that line of work reckoned that there probably isn't yet an AI that could pass the Turing test sufficiently well to get through RFA. But I reckon there is an even chance that we will need a policy such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WereSpielChequers/AI_accounts before the end of Wikipedia's second decade. Regards Jonathan Cardy On 9 February 2011 14:45, Carcharoth <[email protected]> wrote: > http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-12400647 > > "Robots could soon have an equivalent of the internet and Wikipedia." > > Do you think they will let humans edit their Wikipedia? > > Carcharoth > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
