Can we at least agree it's High-importance? Newyorkbrad
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Ian Woollard <[email protected]>wrote: > This encyclopedia has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale. > > This encyclopedia has been checked against the following criteria for > B-Class status: > > 1. Referencing and citation: criterion not met (many common > articles are not adequately referenced) > 2. Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met (currently 3.5 million > of an estimated 4.4 million articles) > 3. Structure: criterion met (seems to be reasonably well structured) > 4. Grammar and style: criterion met (mostly good enough, but would > not please a purist) > 5. Supporting materials: criterion met (multiple wikis surround and > support it) > > I therefore award the Wikipedia class C: > > The Wikipedia is substantial, but is still missing important content > or contains a lot of irrelevant material. The Wikipedia should have > references to reliable sources, but may still have significant issues > or require substantial cleanup. > > The Wikipedia is better developed in style, structure and quality than > Start-Class, but fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may > have some gaps or missing elements; need editing for clarity, balance > or flow; or contain policy violations such as bias or original > research. > > Useful to a casual reader, but would not overall provide a complete > picture for even a moderately detailed study. Considerable editing is > needed to close gaps in content and address cleanup issues. > > -- > -Ian Woollard > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
