"It fails our reliable source requirement."-- geni Wow. Geni that's truly the remark that encapsulates exactly what's wrong with BLPs, and the irresponsible attitude of Wikipedia.
Nevermind our many biased articles, factual errors, and stuff written from "reliable sources" (aka tabloid sensationalist hatchet jobs), we can dismiss the subject trying to set our record straight because it fails our Scriptural requirement. That's Wikipedia's myopic fundamentalism taken to its extreme. Ever considered the requirements just might occasionally be screwed? Scott -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of geni Sent: 28 March 2011 12:26 To: [email protected]; English Wikipedia Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] iCorrect On 28 March 2011 11:53, Fred Bauder <[email protected]> wrote: > A site, where for $1,000, corrections to one's Wikipedia article can be > posted: > > For $1,000, Site Lets Celebrities Say It Ain't So > > https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/28/world/europe/28icorrect.html?ref=todayspa per > > If you search for Wikipedia: > > http://www.icorrect.com/search/node/Wikipedia > > I'm just suggesting it as an editing tool. > > Fred Bauder It fails our reliable source requirement. -- geni _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
