This sort of thing is happening a bit lately. It strikes me as possibly a somewhat more manageable form of expert participation than throwing individual well-meaning experts into a wiki cagefight with individual persistent idiots. How's the community tending to treat such groups?
- d. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin Poulter <[email protected]> Date: 4 April 2011 11:38 Subject: [Wikimediauk-l] Media coverage of Cancer Research UK workshop To: [email protected] BBC News (linked from front page and 4th most popular item currently!) Cancer charity to tidy up Wikipedia http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12887075 The Times Cancer Research UK to edit information on Wikipedia http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/health/news/article2971655.ece (NB behind a paywall) -- Dr Martin L Poulter ICT Manager, The Economics Network Based at the ILRT, University of Bristol: http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ The full experience: http://infobomb.org/ Wikipedia contributor: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MartinPoulter _______________________________________________ Wikimedia UK mailing list [email protected] http://mail.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikimediauk-l WMUK: http://uk.wikimedia.org _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
