I'm not interested. That's the point. You've been whining about this on here for months.
On 2 May 2011 18:06, Mike Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: > Well I would love to provide you very very examples of where I > attempted to fix the problems there. > The wikpedia loves to claim being NPOV but in fact in kosovo there is > a total bent, just compare the de.en,sq and sr wikis via translation, > each of them has its own POV and subscribes to some side. > if you are really interested in this I can tell you more. > mike > > On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 5:08 PM, James Farrar <[email protected]> wrote: >> In your completely neutral opinion, of course. >> >> On 30 April 2011 19:58, Mike Dupont <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Well I can tell you for a fact that the articles about kosovo are not >>> neutral at all, >>> mike >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 5:20 PM, David Gerard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> In a discussion elsewhere [1], the question of how WIkipedia compares >>>> for neutrality with other encyclopedias came up. >>>> >>>> We've been compared with other encyclopedias for accuracy before. Has >>>> anyone ever tried to compare us on neutrality? Or whatever >>>> roughly-synonymous measure doesn't automatically bias the test towards >>>> Wikipedia, which has it as a fundamental content policy. >>>> >>>> Compare Britannica. They've never touted themselves as neutral - >>>> they've touted themselves as *authoritative*.[2] The Wikipedia article >>>> on EB notes that EB has been increasingly lauded as less culturally >>>> biased with time, though it occurs to me that's just the sort of >>>> aspect a Wikipedia writer would note. >>>> >>>> And how good a proxy for what readers actually want is neutrality? I >>>> think it's excellent, but I could be wrong. Do readers actually just >>>> want to be told? >>>> >>>> How would you compare the neutrality of Wikipedia with that of >>>> something else, in a meaningful and useful manner, such that the >>>> framing of the question doesn't necessarily pick the winner before >>>> you've started? >>>> >>>> >>>> - d. >>>> >>>> [1] http://lesswrong.com/lw/5ho/seq_rerun_politics_is_the_mindkiller/422w >>>> [2] Modulo the EB content disclaimer, which makes ours look mild. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> WikiEN-l mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> James Michael DuPont >>> Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania >>> flossk.org flossal.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> WikiEN-l mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> WikiEN-l mailing list >> [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l >> > > > > -- > James Michael DuPont > Member of Free Libre Open Source Software Kosova and Albania > flossk.org flossal.org > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
