> On Tue, 17 May 2011, David Gerard wrote: >> The new site has indeed had about 0 verifiable third-party coverage. > > But the problem is that it's being treated as a "new site" and therefore > all > the notability and such has to start from scratch. How do we determine > that > something remains the "same site" or is a "new site"? > > If the Washington Monument was torn down and rebuilt 2 miles to the west > as > "Washington Monument West", would we need to determine separate > notability > for the Washington Monument West and the Washington Monument?
I must admit to a certain nostalgia for Encyclopedia Dramatica, I am anal retentive, but it was no "Washington Monument". Fred _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
