Presumably we are evaluating the arguments that are not /ad hominem /on their merits, rather than on the /ad hominem/ basis that their author elsewhere makes /ad hominem /attacks?
RMF On 25/05/2011 22:38, David Gerard wrote: > > See, at this point you completely blew your credibility in this > discussion by slipping into ad hominem. That's where you wiped out all > gains from your previous posts in the thread. Don't do this if you > want to be taken seriously. > > > - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
