On 27 June 2011 18:50, priyank bagrecha <bagi.priy...@gmail.com> wrote:
> so is it fair to assume that latex math equations rendered as images
> do not have a image description page? Is there any list of image types
> or some way to verify or know which kind of images will not have image
> description page? I also saw a couple of graphs associated with
> imagemap didnt have image description pages.
> for ex: the chart on the page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corbola
>
> I noticed all the images for which I wasnt able to find image
> description pages had names which looked like some sort of
> hash....basically names consisting of 32 characters using numbers 0-9
> and alphabets a-z with extension png. Am I correctly identifying the
> images without image description pages this way?

You could use image classes to do it. The latex-generated images are
marked with <img class="tex" ...>, and the image source is from
http://upload.wikimedia.org/math/. Normal images (with description
pages etc) have class="image" & a source of, say,
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/.

The timeline ones (which is the code used for the Corbola graph) have
source of http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/timeline/ and use a
<map> tag rather than an image source, which I hadn't seen before.

-- 
- Andrew Gray
  andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk

_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to