2012/1/20 Carcharoth <carcharot...@googlemail.com>: > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Amir E. Aharoni > <amir.ahar...@mail.huji.ac.il> wrote: > >> The biggest difference was in the editorial process - deciding on the >> scope of the article, finding reviewers, proofreading, communicating >> with other writers etc. Since it's not over yet, i cannot write more >> about it, but the comparison between that and writing for Wikipedia >> would be hugely interesting. > > I appreciate you can't say more right now, but can you say whether > "deciding on the scope of the article, finding reviewers, > proofreading, communicating with other writers" is referring to the > process on Wikipedia or the process for the encyclopedia you are > writing for? In my view, that process you describe is how writing on > Wikipedia *should* work. Whether it does in practice or not is another > matter.
It referes to both. These things are done both in Wikipedia and in the paper encyclopedia for which i wrote, but they are done entirely differently. Possibly they are so different that you would even say that on Wikipedia you can't use these words to describe them. -- Amir Elisha Aharoni · אָמִיר אֱלִישָׁע אַהֲרוֹנִי http://aharoni.wordpress.com “We're living in pieces, I want to live in peace.” – T. Moore _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l