http://www.pcenginefx.com/forums/index.php?topic=11381.30
The situation: 1) Wikipedia says game on PSP is emulated. 2) Person who looked at code himself says it's not emulated. 3) Since Wikipedia got its information from a "reliable source", wrong information remains on Wikipedia. (Actually, if you read the "reliable source" carefully, the company representative didn't even say it was emulated; the interviewer claimed that and the company representative just didn't contradict him. I am tempted to remove it on this basis, but someone might argue that we must assume that the interviewer's statements, being part of a published work, are fact-checked). Your call as to whether this is verifiable-but-false, or a problem with the reliable sources or original research rules. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
