On 27 March 2012 21:39, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen <[email protected]> wrote: > My thinking is that a constructive and asymptotically approaching perfection > (hopefully as rapidly as humanly possible) way of doing a good bit of easing > of some of the tensions, would be to start compiling a list of criterions > which > make someone absolutely 100% a chinch to need a wikipedia article about > them, no matter what.
What would the benefit of that list be? Surely no-one is contesting any of the BLPs that fit that description. If something is being contested, then that means it isn't 100% obvious that the article should exist. There's no point trying to fix the articles that aren't broken. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
