On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 9:38 AM, Charles Matthews < [email protected]> wrote:
> On 17 May 2012 17:32, Durova <[email protected]> wrote: > > > That conclusion would be far more convincing if you weren't who you are. > > That's [[ad hominem]] against Carcharoth, and you really need either > to withdraw it, or back it up. The former option is much preferable. > > Charles > That reaction certainly comes as a surprise. Why would you construe an attack or a fallacy? In any meaningful experiment the researcher attempts to reduce the variables to a single factor. Surely you'll agree that an established registered editor's contributions might encounter a different degree of scrutiny from an unregistered IP's edits. Carcharoth himself concedes the possibility. What need could there be to apologize for agreeing? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
