On 17/08/2012, at 11:06 PM, Katie Chan <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 17/08/2012 12:36, Steven Zhang wrote:
>> So, I had a look at articles for creation today, and there was nearly 1,000
>> pending article submissions. Articles for creation has changed a lot since
>> 2008 - it was of a similar structure to XFD - all submissions for a
>> particular day were on one page, and people could come along and approve or
>> reject based in certain criteria.
>
> I can't remember the number off the top of my head, but the number of
> submissions per day back then and the number of submission now is on a
> totally different order. The solution is to get more experienced editors
> reviewing submissions.
The solution indeed would be to get more people participating, there's
no doubt in that, but with over 1000 pending submissions (not declined,
pending) we need to think about what else we can do to fix this.
>
>> I think that system worked well. True, we have a lot more article creations,
>> but I think it gave more visibility than the current system where everything
>> is subpaged.
>
> I agree to that to an extent but one major advantage with the current subpage
> system is the retention of page history when an accepted submission is moved
> to mainspace compare to previously where the reviewing editor start a new
> page and manually copy and paste the submission over.
Perhaps we could restructure things so it's like AFD - in a daily log,
everything subpaged but all new submissions in one single page per day - then
we can check each day off once it's done. This worked in the past, I think it
would work now.
>
> KTC
>
> --
> Experience is a good school but the fees are high.
> - Heinrich Heine
>
>
Steven Zhang
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
