Good point. I am a teacher so tend to rely on refereed journals as reliable sources...tho science writer *J**onah Lehrer* even calls these into question. =============
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Morton <[email protected] > wrote: > Depends on the explanation I suppose. But "reliable source" is jargon > too, in many cases. > > We do have difficulty communicating with non wikipedians. Not in a bad > faith way; it is hard to communicate with others. > > I just think we are too quick to blame the subject for "not > understanding us". When it cuts deeply both ways. > > Tom Morton > > On 8 Sep 2012, at 16:29, Charles Matthews > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 8 September 2012 15:43, Thomas Morton <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > >> Wow high and mighty much? > >> > >> I haven't had chance to look into this; but I bet I know what I will > >> find. Someone being a bit of a jerk to him, which has led to having to > >> take this approach. > > > > > > You might be justified in saying this if he was really told he wasn't > > "credible". If he was told that he wasn't a "reliable source" in WP's > > terms, that is a different kettle of fish. > > > > Charles > > _______________________________________________ > > WikiEN-l mailing list > > [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list [email protected] To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
