It's a problem. Information about the current status of these projects may have fallen off so much that little or nothing can be obtained from a notable source. So you are left with the splash and little else. No obituary available.
Fred > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Citizendium#So_what_and_how_do_we_write_about_this_sort_of_thing.3F > > How to write about things like [[Citizendium]], [[Conservapedia]], > [[Veropedia]] - things that were notable at the time and got lots of > press coverage and hence articles, and which readers may well want to > read about into the future - but which have fallen out of notice and > so their decline (and, in the case of Veropedia, death) got no > coverage and hence we can't answer the reader question "so, whatever > did happen to X?" > > (Anyone who wants to reply saying "Citizendium is alive and well and > will rise again!" or similar needs to check the most recent > WP:RS-suitable coverage from 2011: > http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2011/10/five-year-old-wikipedia-fork-is-dead-in-the-water/ > and particularly the comments, where people have never heard of this > thing and in two weeks no-one even defends the project.) > > > - d. > > _______________________________________________ > WikiEN-l mailing list > WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l > _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
