Hi, another solution I've heard is setting up a special wiki for this (temporarily), using instant Commons to get all relevant images, and using the tools that they used for POTY.
Does that make any sense at all? Lodewijk 2012/8/31 aude <[email protected]> > On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Peter Ekman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nuno, >> >> Thanks for the code. It looked promising, but unfortunately I'm not a >> programmer and the final product never arrived, and I think we'll have >> to "go manual" at this point. >> >> To convert your system to our minimum requirements, we'd have to take >> your "single person" system and >> A. Randomly select, 50 or so photos, and have one person rate these, say >> 1-5. >> B. Store these results >> C. give a new screener another 50 or so photos, and store these results, >> and >> D. do this so 100,000 photos get rated at least 3 times each, then finally >> E. Average all the result for each pic. >> > > > We would need some more time to get this turned into a gadget and the > toolserver has been a bit slow for the backend part. I am travelling so > unfortunately can't finish with a gadget by today. :( > > Anyway, I am not sure how practical it is to have ratings for 100,000 > photos (each!) x 3 times, so I think we need a simplified process for the > US. > > I was thinking we'd have people nominate photos into another category or > something. If there was a way to track which batch of photos have been > looked through for nomination, that would be great, and not sure the best > way (if any) to do that. Is this a good idea? can someone help set it up? > > With a nominated set of photos (not sure how many), then a voting tool > would be useful, and number of photos manageable. > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, > Katie > > > > > >> Obviously some bells and whistles would have been nice, but that would >> have worked. Unfortunately it just never got that far. >> >> If anybody can deliver that in working order before Sept. 10, please >> let me know! >> >> Pete >> User:Smallbones >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 20:24:13 +0100 >> From: Nuno Tavares <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [Wiki Loves Monuments] Automated voting/screening system >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed >> >> Hi Peter, >> >> Didn't our code help? Could you be more specific why the solution >> doesn't apply to you? >> >> >> -NT >> >> >> Em 29-08-2012 16:37, Peter Ekman escreveu: >> > It looks like WLM-US is having bad luck coming up with an automated >> > voting/screening system to sort out the large number of photos we >> > expect to have uploaded. Does anybody have any suggestions or >> > technical solutions? Just to give the basics, I think WLM-US has to >> > be prepared to screen 100,000 photos down to the 500 that the jury can >> > deal with directly. That will likely take input from over 50 editors, >> > e.g. the general logged in US population of editors, and take >> > processing from early on in the contest while the contest is still >> > running, e.g. before Sept. 10. Any help appreciated, >> > Pete >> > User:Smallbones >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments >> http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >> > > > > -- > Board member, Wikimedia District of Columbia > http://wikimediadc.org > @wikimediadc / @wikimania2012 > > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
