On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Maarten Dammers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi David, Naveen and Paul, > > Op 1-9-2012 3:58, David Narvaez schreef: > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Jean-Frédéric >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Yes, but the database cannot distinguish taht. You have to add the >>> additional data in the Header lists. >>> >>> For example, see >>> <https://fr.wikipedia.org/**wiki/Liste_des_monuments_** >>> historiques_de_Lille<https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_des_monuments_historiques_de_Lille> >>> > >>> >>> {{En-tête de tableau >>> MH|région_iso=fr-o|**département_iso=fr-59|commune=**[[Lille]]}} >>> >>> with region_iso is mapped to adm1& département_iso to adm2 by the >>> harvesting bot. >>> >> Could somebody add the "provincia" field of the "Fila PCN" template as >> adm2 to have panamanian monuments grouped by province in the app? >> Thanks in advance. >> > No, I can't do that, but what I did do is add the prov-iso field as > "adm1". Add the codes at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/** > ISO_3166-2:PA#Current_codes<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:PA#Current_codes>and > the mobile app will pick it up. > I did a sample edit at https://es.wikipedia.org/w/**index.php?title=Anexo: > **Monumentos_Históricos_de_**Panamá<https://es.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anexo:Monumentos_Hist%C3%B3ricos_de_Panam%C3%A1>. > Can you do the rest? > > (diff at > https://fisheye.toolserver.**org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=932<https://fisheye.toolserver.org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=932> > ) > > Op 31-8-2012 23:32, Naveen Francis schreef: > > Maarten, >> >> Can you split India monument database into states ? >> Now it is one huge list now >> > Looks like I already got the information, but it was just not included in > the main table. Fixed now. Might take some time to show up in the mobile app > > (diff at > https://fisheye.toolserver.**org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=933<https://fisheye.toolserver.org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=933> > ) > > Thanks Maarten .. will check WLM app after some time. > Op 31-8-2012 23:35, Paul Selitskas schreef: > > Belarusian lists are uploaded into the DB without administrative >> divisions distinction. But we have all lists divided by first- >> (vobłaść) and second-level (rajon) divisions. :( >> > We can fix that. Let's add a vobłaść-iso to include the first level (see > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**ISO_3166-2:BY<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-2:BY>). > This only needs to be added to your header template. > What's rajon in be-x-old? I now added it as "rajon", but you probably want > to use a local name in the template. I can add that to the bot too. You > only have to add that to the header template too. > > (diff at > https://fisheye.toolserver.**org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=934<https://fisheye.toolserver.org/changelog/erfgoed?cs=934>in > a moment) > > Maarten > > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > WikiLovesMonuments@lists.**wikimedia.org<[email protected]> > https://lists.wikimedia.org/**mailman/listinfo/**wikilovesmonuments<https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments> > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.**org <http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org> >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
