On 05/09/12 23:46, Platonides wrote: > Lodewijk: >> people... if there is at some point a discussion worth of being called >> bikeshedding... it must be this one :) > I agree. The spirit of the WLM-exception seems to me that you do not > need to attach any licensing information at all to the picture when > using related to WLM. > > However, for the sake of correctness I've asked her for a more explicit > statement at > http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Lusitana#WLM_logo_license For the record, Lusitana added an exception for includubg the link as expected, see http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File_talk:LUSITANA_WLM_2011_d.svg&diff=prev&oldid=77482612
In her words, «I never thought people would actualy try to put a link to the license on the material» :) _______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
