This is super cool How to get this working for other countries ? -- naveenpf
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Peter Ekman <[email protected]> wrote: > Kaldari came up with a tool for WLM-US which works quite well IMHO as > a part of the jury process, but is not the whole answer. > I'm not a coder, so I can't fully explain it or adapt it for your > uses, so technical questions and requests should go to Kaldari. I'm > also not volunteering him for anything, it's very possible that he may > not have the time, but maybe somebody else could adapt it. > > But feel free to try it - in a real working situation - at > http://toolserver.org/~kaldari/reviewer/review.php for US pictures > I'll just say, when in doubt, hit "can't decide". It also has a quirk > or two - in which case just hit the reload button on your browser or > quit with no harm done. > > The logic is that you can include a photo for further consideration by > clicking "Nominate", or you can eliminate it from further > consideration by clicking "Decline for nomination" and when you can't > decide click "can't decide." It works by manipulating categories on > the photo's file "Category:WLM-US 2012 unreviewed" to start off, then > "reviewed" and/or "nominated" We're aiming to eliminate 90% at this > point - keeping up as the photos come in. But in reality we're > keeping 14%. > I think one of the quirks is when folks manually change categories - > it can just stay in the unreviewed category forever. The fix here is > just manually changing the categories to the correct state. > > It's a tough system (but quick) "one strike and you're out." But it > is needed if you have several thousand photos to go through and want > to get down to a few hundred in a reasonable time so that you can > properly consider the best ones. > > I'd love it if there could be a positive version of this - say click > keep and the bot places the file name in your sandbox - but the > problem there would be you don't eliminate anything and the possible > selection just keeps on growing. > > The ultimate answer would be a voting system something like POTY - but > I have my doubts that this can be done with 1,000s of photos coming in > one end and hundreds coming out the other. The mathematics of proper > discrimination would require at least 5 or so votes (up or down) per > photo so lots of datahandling would be involved. > > So, in short, people judging along multiple dimensions at the same > time and taking time with each photo are going to be required at some > point. The above only helps to winnow in a systematic way, so that > the people can get involved with a reasonable number of photos to deal > with. > > I'd love to hear how other folks handle this problem or anybody who > has a better tool. > > Pete Ekman > User:Smallbones > > > Message: 2 > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:05:03 -0200 > From: Itzik Edri <[email protected]> > To: Wiki Loves Monuments Photograph Competition > <[email protected]> > Subject: [Wiki Loves Monuments] jury process - round 2 > Message-ID: > <CAOi8FzX-KWrv+JUr51LdoxAyhiA7JDXcDep0vH1u= > [email protected]> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi, > > Correct me if I missed something, but I didn't really saw yet a tool which > the chapters can use for the jury process. I saw a link to WMPT tool on the > last thread that I found, but didn't understand at the end of him, if > he available to uses by others, how hard is to install him and etc... > > Is there any new ideas or tools that we may use (the chapters who don't > have technical guys to handle things :)) > > > Itzik > > _______________________________________________ > Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments > http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org >
_______________________________________________ Wiki Loves Monuments mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikilovesmonuments http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org
